Search for: "Vivint Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm by Bloomberg
SunEdison Inc. has yet to complete its $1.9 billion purchase of Vivint Solar Inc. and it’s already shopping some of the company’s rooftop solar assets. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm by Daily Record Staff
SunEdison, Inc., the world’s largest renewable energy development company, and its subsidiary, TerraForm Power, a Bethesda-based owner and operator of clean energy power plants, have agreed to a $2.2 billion purchase deal to acquire Vivint Solar, the companies announced Monday. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am by Logan Murr
In 2015, Vivint, Inc. sued Alarm.com for infringement of three patents, U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:25 pm by Scott McKeown
Abusive Reexam Relief Late last month, in In re Vivint, Inc., the Federal Circuit tackled the question of whether a post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, ex parte reexamination (“EPR”)) was available to a challenger that repeatedly filed another post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, inter partes review (“IPR”)) to forward the very same argument. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am by Logan Murr
In 2015, Vivint, Inc. sued Alarm.com for infringement of three patents, U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:16 pm by Scott McKeown
And recently, a plaintiff in the District of Utah leveraged a PTAB finding to obtain a favorable outcome regarding indefiniteness on summary judgment.In Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am by Melanie J. Vartabedian
Vivint, Inc. and DSI Distributing, Inc., the named plaintiffs alleged that they received unlawful automated telemarketing calls and texts promoting the seller’s products. [read post]