Search for: "Vivint Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm
SunEdison Inc. has yet to complete its $1.9 billion purchase of Vivint Solar Inc. and it’s already shopping some of the company’s rooftop solar assets. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
SunEdison, Inc., the world’s largest renewable energy development company, and its subsidiary, TerraForm Power, a Bethesda-based owner and operator of clean energy power plants, have agreed to a $2.2 billion purchase deal to acquire Vivint Solar, the companies announced Monday. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:37 am
Vivint Solar, Inc., 2017 WL 2661597 (2d Cir. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:37 am
Vivint Solar, Inc., 2017 WL 2661597 (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
Vivint Smart Home Inc. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:41 am
Vivint stated that Dr. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am
In 2015, Vivint, Inc. sued Alarm.com for infringement of three patents, U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:25 pm
Abusive Reexam Relief Late last month, in In re Vivint, Inc., the Federal Circuit tackled the question of whether a post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, ex parte reexamination (“EPR”)) was available to a challenger that repeatedly filed another post-issuance review proceeding (in this case, inter partes review (“IPR”)) to forward the very same argument. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:59 am
Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am
In 2015, Vivint, Inc. sued Alarm.com for infringement of three patents, U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 428, 449 (1976)). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:50 am
In re Vivint, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:16 pm
And recently, a plaintiff in the District of Utah leveraged a PTAB finding to obtain a favorable outcome regarding indefiniteness on summary judgment.In Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:53 pm
” Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 6:40 pm
USA, Inc. v.Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am
Vivint, Inc. and DSI Distributing, Inc., the named plaintiffs alleged that they received unlawful automated telemarketing calls and texts promoting the seller’s products. [read post]